Latest Posts
-
·
RLTL;DR: Apple’s Approach to Learning From Failed Agent Attempts
Apple RLTL;DR achieves 12-13% Pass@1 where GRPO stalls at 0%, extracting 17-token lessons from failed rollouts and training the task-to-insight mapping into weights.
-
·
SPLASH: Change LLM Serving Topology Mid-Request Without Draining
SPLASH switches LLM attention parallelism layout live mid-request with under 0.51% overhead, improving throughput 1.3-1.73x over fixed-layout deployments on B200 GPUs.
-
·
ContextRender: Agent Context Built From Execution Dependencies
ContextRender tracks tool-result reuse in a persistent execution graph, matching full-history performance with a 6K budget and cutting inference cost by 10.2-32.2%.
-
·
Stanford’s 1.5-SPSA Trains OPT-30B Without Backpropagation
1.5-SPSA trains OPT-30B on 60 GB instead of 600 GB, using probe-space preconditioning to beat backpropagation accuracy on SST-2 in 70 steps.
-
·
Context Language Models Let Agents Rewrite Their Own Context
UW and Meta’s Context Language Models treat context as an editable file, achieving 11.4% higher accuracy and 21.5% fewer FLOPs on deep-research tasks.
-
·
Six Systems Making the Agent Harness a Trainable Artifact
Six research systems from 2026 treat the agent harness as a separately optimizable artifact alongside model weights, cutting inference cost by up to 98.6% and raising agent success rates.
-
·
Six Context Garbage Collectors: The Systems Deciding What an Agent Is Allowed to Forget
Six systems that decide what long-horizon agents are allowed to forget: ACON, Self-GC, StateComp, Forget Reasoning, PaMER, and DRSR — with exact numbers and design tradeoffs.
-
·
Five Systems, Two Phases: How LLM Inference Is Being Split Apart
From separate GPU pools to different model checkpoints and custom silicon, five systems show prefill and decode splitting into distinct computational products.
-
·
Five Approaches Making LLM Inference Cryptographically Verifiable
Five systems let clients verify that a remote LLM ran the claimed model on their prompt, without re-running inference or taking the provider at their word.









